Exercise/maneuver efficiency
Preface: I recently observed an instructor with a class doing a particular exercise and couldn’t help ask myself “Why is he doing this? What is the benefit to the student? Does it relate and easily blend back to *actual* skiing? Is it efficient, or is this exercise chewing up time that could be better spent otherwise?” In certification prep classes the examiners would have us do stuff that to this day I still cannot understand how it related to what I would need as a skier or as an instructor.
I hope you will participate in this discussion. I will gladly feature you and your ideas in future blogs if you would like to participate. Again, everything contained in my blogs is simply MY opinion. You should not take it as gospel as you be examining EVERYTHING you are told about skiing and ski instruction and use what works best for you.
I believe we as ski instructors need to examine WHAT we do and WHY we do it and WHEN we teach it. We often teach exercises and maneuvers that have limited effectiveness. I often wonder why we continue to use obsolete techniques and maneuvers that slow down or even impede our ski students’ progress? This is the beginning of a discussion on such things.
This first entry is something that is something that every newbie instructor is trained to teach, but I have to question why we haven’t yet abandoned it?
The notorious “bullfighter”. Why do we teach this? What does it accomplish? What are the implications? Is there an alternative?
Bullfighter-Why?
Some would say that it allows the new skier to ready themselves to make their first straight run.
Benefits to the Bullfighter? What is it suppose to do?
It allows the skier to turn their skis into the fall line before starting any sliding. The skier can then remove their poles from the snow and begin sliding once they feel “prepared”.
Are there negatives to the “bullfighter”?
1) The students learn to use their hands/poles as braking devices which transfers to their skiing.
2) In a class situation, it slows the class waiting for each student to get into position before they actually do any ski activity. The amount of time it takes for each student to utilize this action is disproportionate to its arguably few benefits.
3) The hands become an issue of posture and balance when sliding begins and may contribute to unnecessary tension in the skier’s body.
4) Some students do not have sufficient arm and upper body strength to do this maneuver comfortably.
5) Students miss out on learning how to effectively start movement (by turning their feet without using poles first) by gradually turning into the fall line and gradually beginning the slide.
Are there Alternatives?
Instead of the bullfighter, (while standing across the fall line on extremely gentle terrain) have the student pick up each ski sequentially (essentially marching, but only picking up the skis slightly), and with baby steps begin pointing the skis toward the fall line. As the skis point more toward and into the fall line they will gradually begin moving forward. Continuation of the marching and direction change will actually create a path whose shape resembles a turn. From that point, it is a simple matter of changing the march to a shuffle (retaining the turn shape, of course). As the skier gains confidence in sliding freely while shuffling, have them eliminate the shuffle while retaining theguiding motion… and voila… you have created a skier (if you’ve taught it correctly, a parallel skier, no less!).
Please not that it is important to make sure the slope you select is *very* gentle at first to keep the student at ease while learning this (and every other) new skill.
Additional Benefits?
The alternative method of starting the skiing action is that with the gentle guiding in the turn path, the student can learn to control speed through turn shape rather than through a braking action. The student learns independent foot action, yet discovers how both skis can ultimately be guided in the snow together.
Important note: I am not advocating the abandonment of braking maneuvers, but braking should be taught , as a secondary speed control skill, not a primary one. Near universal use of shaped skis allow most skiers to not only ski, but ski parallel in a fraction of the time than with straight skis. Yes, there will be skiers where sliding movement at any speed will create fear. In the case of fearful skiers the braking maneuvers as speed *fearful skiers*control and potentially the bullfighter can be used. However, those techniques should be considers as remedial and a fallback plan. As always, terrain selection and judgement are key elements to safety and success.
In closing
There are many techniques and exercises which we ski instructors ask our students to perform. Try to take the shortest route to the ultimate goal. Make sure that exercises are pertinent to the goal and that they actually can be blended back into real skiing. Can you suggest any other teaching boondoggles that you regularly see? We can talk about them in future blogs.
Ski Well!




